CockroachDB with SQLAlchemy and MIT Kerberos

Today, I'm going to demonstrate how easily we can integrate a SQLAlchemy application running against a kerberized CockroachDB cluster. The experience building this appliation was almost too easy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CockroachDB performance characteristics with YCSB(A) benchmark

This month I was on a hiatus in terms of blog posts and had to focus on the other parts of my life. Nevertheless, this post was long time coming and I was ambitiously waiting for a quiet time to get this out of the door. Today, I'm talking about CockroachDB and the ever so popular YCSB benchmark suite. Specifically, I'm going to step through the workload A in the YCSB suite of workloads against CockroachDB.
Read more

Digsby is bringing out a Linux and Mac client very soon

Hey all, my new favorite multi-protocol IM client is soon to become a multi-platform client. It is still in beta and they're already rolling out a client for the other two platforms. It is a great news to me because I literally fell in love with Digsby on Windows and every time I find myself using Kopete or Pidgin on Linux I yearn for Digsby. It is just so great at what it does. Hope the Linux client is not crippled and offers just as many features as Windows. Sign up for notification here . p.s. Ars did a nice and simple review of Digsby here . Talk to you soon.
Read more

Codex vs Claude vs GLM 5.2: A Practical Comparison

Image
The question I keep getting asked is which AI coding assistant I actually use day to day. The honest answer is that I use more than one, and the reason is that none of them is uniformly the best. Each one has a lane where it clearly wins, and each one has a failure mode that pushes me back to the others. This post is a practical comparison of three tools I have spent real time with: Codex, Claude, and GLM 5.2. I am not interested in benchmark scores or leaderboard positioning. I care about how these tools behave across the full lifecycle of a project: initial scaffolding, iterative refinement, design polish, and long-running reliability. The short version: GLM 5.2 has replaced Codex as my daily driver for implementation work. Codex failed the wife test, which is what pushed me to switch. Claude is strong on design and polish but showed a huge regression after two weeks of use. GLM 5.2 is great at identifying tiny lingering issues and regressions, but the last 24 hours of work showed...
Read more